Broka Pack I – Planets

These images are on an open use policy.  Meaning that you are allowed to use these images without monetary compansation as long as you provide credit.

Broka Pack I – Vessels

These images are on an open use policy.  Meaning that you are allowed to use these images without monetary compansation as long as you provide credit.

Jupiter Is Not a Failed Star

larwood-003-jupiter

Image taken by Micheal Larwood, amateur astronomer

It’s often said by educators that Jupiter is a failed star, that if it only had a little bit more mass it would be a second star in the Solar system. Then why is it that we are finding gas giant planets about 10 times its mass orbiting other stars? Now that doesn’t seem terribly much bigger than Jupiter until you realize just how large Jupiter really is. It has a volume of 1.43 x 10^15 (that’s 10 with fifteen zeroes) cubic killimeters. Over 1,300 Earths could fit inside it and it has a gravity well that extends so far that Jupiter prevented the asteroid belt from coalescing into a planet. It is even theorized that the gas giant may have allowed life to form on Earth (I may have an additional write up on that). But I digress.

How big of a gas giant can you get before there is enough mass to begin core fusion? Brown dwarfs are much more massive than Jupiter could ever dream of being but are still not really stars. They don’t fuse hydrogen. They sort of glow a bit in the red end of the spectrum, which is why they’re so hard to spot. They’re close, but not quite close enough. If anything, these brown dwarfs are the real failed stars, not Jupiter. In order to really shine like a star you need approximately 80 times Jupiter’s mass to really kick off that core fusion… the mass of a red dwarf star. So for there to be a Jupiter that acts like a second star in the Solar system we would need another 79 Jupiters worth of mass.

So, why is it that astronomers, experts in the field, still say that Jupiter is a “failed star”? I don’t buy the whole popularization of astronomy that science centers and planetaria use. I know the general public is ignorant of astronomical phenomenon and I get it that they may choose to be so. However, claiming inaccuracies like this is not doing the field any favours. You may capture some initial interest but you will find that you will more often lose that budding little amateur astronomer when they find out the truth. Their conclusion may be, “scientists lie”. Scientists lie? Where have I heard… ah yes… climate change denial. We are all familiar with what happened when scientists were undermined by politicians, corporations and shills of the oil industry. But I hear you… that wasn’t the fault of the scientists. Yet if you think about it you may realize that if much of the world reacted the way they did by denying the science behind climate change, how do you think people will react when a blatant misrepresentation of facts is so consistently and repeatedly perpetrated, no matter how small that “lie” may be? Exactly. Let’s stop trying to popularize science and discovery by issuing misleading/false facts and stretched truth. This is science… not politics.

Peace.

Featured Photo

andromeda

It weighs in at 1,230 billion solar masses, spans 220,000 light years in diameter and harbours a trillion stars.  It is the Andromeda galaxy.  When compared to our Milky Way it’s a monstrosity of epic proportions, yet it is still a rather minor galaxy on the entirety of the universe.

andromeda-scope

 

 

This image was taken with a Canon T2i DSLR using a Celestron Nexstar 4 inch Telescope, auto-guided with an 80mm Orion telescope.  It took a single 20 minute exposure, and a location far enough south, to catch Andromeda’s dust.  The photo was taken by amature astronomer, Mike Larwood, who explains further, “ISO for the shot was 800 and the Telescope shoots about f/11 aperture, hence the long exposure needed to image the dust rings with such a small lens.”

Congratulations, Mike, you have the Lemon’s first featured photo.

Peace